sanctity |ˈsa ng (k)titē|
noun ( pl. -ties)
the state or quality of being holy, sacred, or saintly : the site of the tomb was a place of sanctity for the ancient Egyptians.noun ( pl. -ties)
• ultimate importance and inviolability : the sanctity of human life.
ORIGIN late Middle English (in the sense [saintliness] ): from Old French sainctite, reinforced by Latin sanctitas, from sanctus ‘holy.’
So this gay marriage debate/debacle has me thinking. Personally, I don't get marriage. I think it's one of those silly social things that people do simply because that's what people do. I'm sure we all know the history of marriage as an economic contract and have come to our own conclusions about its evolution for humans and blah blah blah...but I'm not going to sit here and talk about why I think marriage is stupid. Because even though I think it's a stupid social convention, I think it's a stupid social convention everyone should be allowed to follow if they please.
Most secular folks who are cool with gay people also seem to be cool with gay marriage. My guess is that for those of us who do not affiliate with a religion, a "civil union" and a marriage are synonymous, and if gay people can have civil unions, then why can't they have marriages? But there are many religious folks who are cool with gay people and not cool with gay marriage, because of this one little word: sanctity. There is, according to them, a special feature to marriage that can only exist if there is one man and one woman present.
It's strange that there's this idea that if gay people could get married, it would disrupt the sanctity of straight people's marriages. Now, I'm willing to accept that for some people a gay marriage will never truly be holy or official, but how does this affect others' marriages? I dunno, maybe someone can enlightenment me about this. In addition, you'd think that people who love marriage enough to donate to the preservation of its sanctity would want there to be more marriages, not less. Spread the marriage around, man.
My bigger problem with this anti-gay marriage nonsense, however, is that some people seem to think that the opposite of a holy marriage is a gay marriage. I disagree. I believe that the opposite of a holy marriage is a divorce, and I'm surprised that more religious groups don't see it this way too. I mean, the Church, that great and holy institution, was vehemently against divorce for many, many years (I believe Henry VIII had a small debate with them over this). Marriage is supposed to be "for better or for worse" right? So why do so many marriages end? It would seem to me that even the notion that a marriage could end in divorce (for example, arrangements of the pre-nuptial kind) should itself be enough to ruin the sanctity of it.
So then, where is the anti-divorce brigade? This would surely preserve the sanctity of marriage by dissuading people who rush into it without thinking seriously, or those who do it for tax or citizenship reasons, and then eventually get divorced. And, of course, it wouldn't just be straight people who would be discouraged from rushing into marriages, but a good number of gay people too would re-consider their desire for marriage if they knew that divorce was not an option. Marriage as a sacred institution, as a lifelong contract between two consenting, loving partners, would therefore be preserved.
My conclusion: I call for a Proposition 8a, a ban on divorce (and a reversal on the ban on gay marriage).

